You've heard of residential schools but have you heard of Mental Asylums?

[CaptainTrouble]

Over the 150 years we had asylums, about 1m people were locked up against their will (in Canada. It's a very rough estimate because the actual numbers don't exist, of course). About 95% of the people locked up against their will were White people. This was basically a holocaust against White people by our government. Total number of residential school students? 150,000.

Where's the memorials for the asylum victims? Why isn't this taught in schools about the atrocities committed against White people by our government? Where's the national holiday? The Canadian government eventually admitted wrong-doing in the 2010. A good 32 years after the program officially ended. What they did to the people in asylums pales in comparison to anything they did in residential schools.

The government of Canada has paid $15b to Native Indians for reparations over Residential Schools and only paid $3.6b in reparations to survivors of asylums. Also, the reparations are upwards of $60b to Native Indians if you include the programs the government implemented as successors to be reparations) 150,000 total people versus 1m. How is this justice?

I made an interesting discovery on the asylum subject. A question many people ask is where did the idea even come from, why did it exist for the specific period it did, why was it global and why did it end nearly at the same time everywhere. What exactly was going on? Well, here's something to consider: Ever hear about the Tartaria Conspiracy Theory? The idea is that Old World Buildings made of stone were existing structures from a past civilization (Tartaria) and we inherited them rather than built them. People who knew the truth were thrown into asylums to hide the truth. This theory is probably not something you agree with but it got me thinking. We built all these beautiful and hand-carved stone structures in abundance and quite easily in short period of time and then abruptly stopped. What happened to all the master masons? They went from a high-paid in-demand skilled worker to nothing over night? That ought to have a pretty big impact on one's psyche... Why didn't we hear about the worker outrage over this lost industry? It wouldn't just be the direct workers either... all the people in the quarries, all the supply-chain people, all the architects specializing in those buildings, etc... If any major industry just stopped abruptly, we'd probably hear something about it. There were literally wars over the mechanization of farming ending that industry as we once knew it. Well, it just so happens that asylums were big in NA and Europe nearly the exact same time both societies started cutting down their stone construction and the asylums peak at exactly the same time stone production stopped altogether in NA and was at its lowest in history in Europe (Europe never killed it off completely and there has since been a resurgence). Many of the asylum victims were described as "transient laborers". The number of people tied to the stone-industry that was killed mostly completely in NA was well into the hundreds of thousands.

Basically, my idea is that governments were probably seeing a lot of skilled workers losing their jobs around this period of time as they were transitioning a lot of their industries from traditional methods to the new methods and asylums were developed as a means to house a lot of the people who had become destitute from the changing economy. I imagine many people tied to the stone industry found other work but I bet a lot didn't. For many, it was all their knew and all they ever wanted to know. Stonemasers in particular were a different breed. Most of their work was passed down verbally from master-to-apprentice. There was literally no real solid publicly available books (in English) on masonry until the mid 1800s yet the industry had been around for thousands of years. Stonemasons were extremely philosophical and believed their work had higher purpose/meaning than just carving some stones. The early books on stone masonery we did end up getting have tons of chapters dedicated to geometry and natural laws that almost reads like some esoteric spell book at times. There's a reason the Freemasons are what they are known for (being connected to every esoteric conspiracy theory ever) even though they started as a simply a guild for stone masons. If any group was going to be upset at their industry being killed, it would be the stone masons but I don't remember hearing about the stone mason uprising in my history books. I think a lot got thrown into asylums.

 

[WHlTE_W4LKER]

Massive intricate buildings
Mud roads
Horse and buggy
Empty cities
Massive fires

"Founded" plaques. Literally found?

 

[CaptainTrouble]

The Tartaria evidence is hard to ignore. Even if we built all the buildings, the stories behind all the buildings are highly sketch.

Massive intricate buildings - We weren't stupid in the past and in some areas we were in fact smarter. "Constant Progress" is actually a modern lie because historically many civilizations have ups/downs surrounding certain tech and industries.
Mud roads - They shipped the stone by water for most of the way. You'd have to find large stone buildings in areas no where close to a quarry or body of water. Most of them are by bodies of water.
Horse and buggy - Again, the shipping for the majority of it was actually done via waterways. They only needed to transport it a short distance via horse and buggy which is very logistically possible.
Empty cities - You have to start somewhere and theoretically Stone Masonry was highly advanced by this period of time since it's how we were constructing things for thousands of years. It actually makes sense that a lot of the first buildings would be big stone buildings. Some rich person would have financed it or the government to make a statement.
Massive fires - The 1800s are when new technologies were first introduced and people were not aware of the fire hazards. Stone buildings counterintuitively are incredibly flammable because of the non-stone used in the building. The stone actually acted as insolate for the wooden parts of the building's construction which would catch fire making it difficult to put out and making it difficult to repair the damage. The fact stone buildings were catching fire isn't in itself questionable because they could and the way these buildings were constructed are SIGNIFICANTLY worse at being fire-proof than modern constructed buildings ironically. These old stone buildings in the way they were constructed basically helped spread the fire to everything but modern buildings are designed to be a lot more compartmentalized if a fire breaks out. Prior to the 1800s, the number of things that could cause a fire were significantly less. You had candles and that was about it and the culture around handling candles in buildings had been developed over centuries. When the 1800s hit, there were significantly more ways a building could catch on fire and no one had experience using any of this technology safely. That's why so many of these fires started including the great fires. Also, many of these cities were 90% wood not stone construction because of all the cheap construction required for the population increase. You never see these shanties in photos though. Yet people who push Tartaria point to our residential construction and then point to an expensive stone building. We do build some pretty cool modern structures today that would be a far better comparison. We have shitty apartments for the peasants and the wealthy businesses are in Glass Palaces downtown just like in the 1800s.

Anyway, I still think a lot of the narratives around the fires are suspect. There was probably a combination of new tech leading to more fires, non-fire proof stone construction as well as some insurance fraud, some jews (arsons) and I think some of the narratives surrounding these old structures were actually made up. On wikipedia, we've discovered that a significant number of contributors have made up things for their contribution just to feel good about themselves being a contributor (some basic human psychological factors at play here and aren't a government/controller conspiracy). I also think whoever oversees these buildings today may have also made up a history just to give it more credibility. When people look at the history of other buildings similar to these old buildings they often come across a fire story so they make one up to give the narrative they're making up more credibility. Fake fires and reconstructions can be a very useful tools to explain discrepancies between the original construction and the current building where a legitimate reason for the discrepancy was lost but the people creating these narratives don't want to admit to not having it because of the loss of credibility doing so would have to the public but fire narratives can patch that up.

If someone wants to explore the fire narratives on these buildings more they should look into the literal person who created the narrative and what they source was. Half the government officials in charge of these buildings know nothing about them and have virtually no info on them yet their website speaks to all about the building's history. Who specifically wrote the website's information? Where did they get the info from? That's where I would start to really look into some of these narratives. A lot of them read like fanfic created specifically to sell the tour entry fee without anyone asking too many questions rather than necessarily the truth.

Overall, I'm still not convinced we didn't build these structures. I think we precisely did stop progressing as a society (an argument Tartarian theorists use: Basically being that society doesn't usually regress but we see regression in building construction so that's evidence of Tartaria). We see it again today with DEI and the "Competency Crisis". Our overall competence at certain things is decreasing not increasing. We see this every generation in modernity where the previous generation complains about some deficiency in the new generation surrounding their competence at something. Technology is being pushed as a replacement for competency. This would have happened to Building Construction also. Competency in Building Construction did in fact decrease and there's many reasons for why this happened but changing technology was a large factor. If you read some of the old books on Stone Masonry, all of them read like geometry textbooks with philosophy and esoteric symbolism all thrown in. People argue about how precise some of the old stone masonry was and all the hidden patterns/symbols/meaning behind the building but that's precisely what was taught to Stone Masons and that art was lost when we mechanized everything.

Your name is White Walker and I know you've liked many of my exceptionally racist or Pro-White posts. Don't fall for the jewish trap that our ancestors weren't capable of great things like building these buildings because they were. It wasn't Tartaria that built these buildings, it was White People unencumbered by jewish bureaucracy that built these buildings. If we removed the jew today and shifted society toward a more empowering decentralized society like we had in the 1800s, we could start building buildings like these again but also we might not want to. While the buildings look better than modern buildings they have some flaws, such as their weight leading to a realistic cap on height which is a problem for cities as dense as the ones we have today. Population increases (another jewish feature of our society) led people to naturally move away from these types of buildings. There's also the issue of Corporation versus Sole Prop/Partnership. Most of these old buildings were constructed by sole props or partnerships by Master Masons. Today, most of our buildings are constructed by corporations. This matters because if you do poor quality work and get sued as a partnership or sole prop, the Master Mason's entire personal net worth would be on the hook for potential settlements and he'd ruin his reputation. This led to these builders taking their work very seriously and ensuring there weren't fuckups (another argument of Tartaria is that all builders never fucked up and basically yeah in the old days when your entire person was on the line, you didn't fuck up). Nowadays because builders use corporations, only the corporation is on the hook for settlements and no one's personal reputation is on the line in the same way. A lot of corporations for Builders are specifically designed to have 0 equity in them so if they get sued, the person suing them basically has no resource since there's no assets to pay them in the corporation they're suing. This leads to the owners caring about their work way less today than in the past. Another jewish feature of our society.

White people literally built these buildings because we are truly that great. Don't forget that!

 

[fortysixyears]

I don't know about mental asylums, but these posts look like a BestBuy receipt with 1 item.