The claim that Somalia produces a high number of people with physical deformities due to inbreeding is not supported by the available evidence and oversimplifies a complex issue. While consanguineous marriages (marriages between close relatives) do occur in some Somali communities, the prevalence and impact are often misrepresented.
Genetic studies indicate that the Somali population exhibits a higher burden of short runs of homozygosity (ROH), which are genomic segments indicating recent inbreeding, compared to many other African populations.3 This suggests some level of consanguinity, particularly among certain subclans, and may be linked to cultural practices such as marrying within clans or among first or second cousins.8 One study cited on social media estimated that nearly half (48.7%) of Somalis are products of first or second cousin marriages, with an average inbreeding coefficient (FROH) of 0.018, slightly higher than expected for second cousin unions.8 However, this figure may vary significantly by region and community, and it does not equate to a majority of the population being inbred.
Despite this, the idea that inbreeding is widespread or the primary cause of physical deformities in Somalia is not accurate. In fact, many sources suggest that cousin marriage is not as common in Somalia as often assumed and is frequently misrepresented or used as a derogatory stereotype.2 When such marriages do occur, they are often arranged by older relatives to strengthen family bonds, but they are not the norm across the entire population.2
The risk of congenital abnormalities and genetic disorders does increase in offspring of closely related parents due to the higher likelihood of recessive genetic mutations being expressed.2 However, this risk is generally small for a single generation of cousin marriage—estimated at a 4–7% chance of congenital anomalies, compared to 2–3% in the general population.2 The risk compounds over generations, which is more relevant in societies with long-standing, repeated consanguineous unions, such as in parts of Pakistan.9 There is no evidence that Somalia has a higher rate of such disorders than other populations with similar genetic histories.
Furthermore, the perception that Somalis are genetically homogeneous or prone to deformities is a misconception. Genetic and archaeological evidence shows that Somalis have a deep and diverse ancestry, with significant genetic contributions from both African and non-African populations, including ancient migrations from the Arabian Peninsula.5 The population is phenotypically diverse, and the idea of a "homogeneous" Somali race is inaccurate.6
In summary, while some genetic studies indicate a higher level of recent inbreeding in certain Somali groups, this does not translate to a widespread or disproportionate number of people with physical deformities. The claim that inbreeding is the main cause of such conditions in Somalia is not supported by the data and overlooks the complexity of genetic, environmental, and social factors involved.
www.zerohedge.com
nypost.com
