Carney’s personal investments

border_humper

Staff Member
Moderator
Chief Disinfo Officer

Prime Minister Mark Carney has for decades preached climate virtue to a global audience while quietly profiting from oil, gas and airline giants — the sectors he claims threaten the planet.

Carney, upheld along with his wife Diana Fox Carney by the Liberal establishment and media as a so-called visionary of sustainable finance, is the former UN Special Envoy for Climate Action and Finance and vice-chair of Brookfield Asset Management’s Global Transition Fund.

Yet, behind the net-zero rhetoric lies a massive personal fortune rooted in industries he publicly attacks, tucked away in a blind trust allegedly since he became Liberal leader in March.

The prime minister’s newly released financial disclosure to the Ethics Commissioner reveals that more than 95% of Carney’s holdings are based in the US in industries like oil, tech and finance. A mere handful of companies out of more than 600 on the disclosure list were based in Canada, including oil and gas and railway holdings, as well as Brookfield Asset Management (formerly a Canadian company before it transferred its primary listing to the US).
His portfolio included shares in:

  • ExxonMobil, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, Marathon Petroleum, Valero Energy and Halliburton — some of the largest oil producers and services companies in the world
  • Ovintiv and Canadian Natural Resources, both major players in Alberta’s oil sands, a frequent target of leftist environmental criticism
  • Phillips 66 and Targa Resources, US refiners and midstream operators that profit directly from fossil fuel infrastructure
When asked about potential hypocrisy on March 6, Carney snapped back at reporters: “I have more than complied with all the rules,” according to CBC.

Despite decrying the growing power of Silicon Valley and calling for tougher regulation of data and privacy, Carney held investments in Apple, Amazon, Google, Microsoft and Meta (Facebook).

He’s also publicly supported banking reform and warned against risky lending practices — yet invested heavily in JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, Capital One and Morgan Stanley. More than 95% of his public holdings are in American companies, many of them direct competitors to Canadian firms that would be hit hard by tariffs.

View: https://x.com/marcnixon24/status/1944170666594643976?s=61&t=gOuPM4AwCWPbUFeBYBm1rg
Carney’s personal wealth is invested in USA entities, in industries like oil, gas, airlines, Wall Street banks, and defence contractors because of course it is. Sounds like he could give better stock tips than Nancy Pelosi.
 
Upvote 11



View: https://x.com/marcnixon24/status/1944170666594643976?s=61&t=gOuPM4AwCWPbUFeBYBm1rg
Carney’s personal wealth is invested in USA entities, in industries like oil, gas, airlines, Wall Street banks, and defence contractors because of course it is. Sounds like he could give better stock tips than Nancy Pelosi.
border_humper

The hens (Canadians) elected the fox to guard their house.
 
Carney was Trudeau's financial policy advisor for years. This wasn't exactly a secret. Anyone who thought journalist Chrystia Freeland actually ran Canada's finances was a fool.

Of course he was in it for personal enrichment/financial gain. Of course he would have shares in J&J, Pfizer and Moderna. Politicians made millions of dollars off of "Safe and Effective" policies. They would sell out their own friends and family for money, many of them did exactly that.
 
I mean he might be evil but he's not retarded. why would he invest money in Canada? if you have most of your holdings in the Canadian market, get a new financial advisor
 
Even our pension fund invests more in the US than Canada by a factor of four (12% vs 47%). Invests even more in European companies than Canadian.
 
Yup, I always tell everyone to invest in XAW. Basically, global fund that doesn't include Canada.

There's actually other reasons for it too from a Canadian's perspective. If the economy does well in Canada such that stocks do well then supposedly your wage and buying power will go up but if it does poorly then your wage does poorly. This is inverse to what you want. When your labor is doing poorly you don't want your capital to do poorly because you'll have less money to invest at the time when investments are low. What you want is for Canada's economy to grow and for the price of capital to be low but this is less likely to happen if the capital you're invested in is Canadian. Also, if Canada continues to do poorly but you're invested outside of Canada at least then it'll have a higher chance of potentially doing good so you don't just get killed both in you wage and your capital value.

It's actually sound investment advice for the typical laborer not to the invest in the same economy they work in.

Of course, there's a lot of other factors at play too. Sometimes you want to invest where you work to help bolster the economy and sometimes your assets could be taken away if in another country.
 
Back
Top