Climate skeptics more likely to rank higher on spectrum of narcissism, machiavellianism and psychopathy!

Literally Soviet-tier propaganda: "if you question the government you are dangerously mentally ill"
 
Well put, makes you wonder about GAiD being expanded to include mental illness. Will it be always be voluntary?

It's all heading down a very Orwellian path. When people critical of the government and their narratives start to disappear, how many will go along? 85-90%, we've already witnessed how quickly people turn on friends, family and co-workers.

History keeps repeating. It's an endless loop that collective humanity isn't intelligent enough to avoid.
 
Just more propaganda designed to shame people who can think for themselves. They desperately want to achieve the communist hive mind.

You'd have to be a fool to think Climate Change is real.


View attachment 2yNxP3y3uysmyXV_.mp4
Believe actual scientific research?

Or

Believe the Doomsday Cult(U.N.) that has been wrong about every single Doomsday prediction they've ever made?
The one who claims the only way to save the world is to pay them more money. A tax on air will save the world, we swear. Their demands never stop. Their greed knows no bounds.


View: https://x.com/junonewscom/status/1796274367061463517?
In the House of Commons Canadian families were accused of killing the planet for taking a road trip.

These Climate Change zealots are beyond insane, yet we are the ones being smeared once again for not believing their lies.

We aren't the ones making wild accusations with zero proof to back it up.
 
Scott Pruysers is an associate professor in the political science department at Dalhousie University and the lead author of the study, published in March in the journal Climatic Change.
Click to expand...

I'm sure the political science major that a climate change journal was willing to publish went into the "study" with an open mind and definitely didn't set it up to get a specific result.....

He says understanding the personality roots of climate skepticism can help develop more effective strategies to encourage environmentally conscious behavior. "The precursor to developing good policy or understanding why people care about this issue is understanding who doesn't care about it, who remains skeptical," he said. "And so we're going to have to get kind of creative and smarter with the messaging."
Click to expand...

Climategate proved that we cannot trust any data published on this topic, because we know for a fact that anyone who questions the narrative is smeared and shut out of the conversation.

Journals won't publish anything that counters The Message. Schools will bully and fire any professor or researcher who even attempts to counter The Message.

But yeah I'm totally willing to ignore all of that and believe climate change is a problem if you just put a new spin on The Message! /s

Edit: Also, a real journalist would point out Climategate in this article. They only highlight the "pro" side, but leave out crucial details that support the "con" side.

But lying by omission is one of their favorite ways of gaslighting readers.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top