Viewing Modernity from the Lens of a Conquered People

C

CaptainTrouble

Based Member
Here are common techniques employed by conquerors to ensure dominance after conquering a people:


  • Elimination of the Warrior Class: In classical antiquity (such as Greek andrapodismos practiced during the Peloponnesian War), conquering forces often executed all adult men (androcide) while capturing women and children.
  • Decapitation of Leadership: Executing kings, generals, and scholars prevented remnants of the conquered society from organizing counter-rebellions.
  • Captive-Taking: Conquered women and children were integrated into the imperial economy as enslaved labor or forcibly married into the conqueror's society, altering regional demographics over generations.
  • Desecration of Sacred Sites: Destroying temples, breaking local religious idols, or transforming sacred spaces into temples of the conquerors' gods signified that the vanquished society’s deities had failed them.
  • Hostage Systems (Obsides): Empires routinely demanded the sons and daughters of local rulers as political hostages. These children were raised in the imperial capital, educated in the conquerors' language and culture, and returned home as loyal vassal rulers.
  • Divide and Rule: Elevating minority ethnic or social groups within a conquered territory created a loyal local proxy force dependent on the imperial power for its authority.
  • Imperial Resettlement: The Neo-Assyrian Empire forcibly relocated hundreds of thousands of conquered people across different corners of the empire, mixing ethnic groups to dismantle cohesive linguistic and regional identities.
  • Imposing the conqueror's legal system, tax obligations, and official language while banning indigenous laws, writing systems, or traditional assemblies eroded generational memory and forced integration into the imperial administrative network.

Now, let's analyze how these apply to modernity.


  • Warrior class eliminated in World War I and World War II
  • All monarchies removed from power after the World Wars
  • Academia completely blocking off the "right-wing" from partaking and is wholly captured by "leftism"
  • White leaders having their sons and daughters marry jews
  • Hot young White models in the public sphere are married to jews
  • Women are integrated into the workforce
  • Destruction of Old World Buildings
  • Bringing in immigrants to mate with the conquered people
  • Imposing central banking, increasing taxes to pay immigrants and non-domestic people with the tax funds and a legal system promoted by jewish lawyers/judges

It does appear to look like White people were conquered by jews after the World Wars and are now facing the consequences of such a loss.
 
Upvote 11
IMG_8444.jpeg
 
The photo above reminds me of one I saw in "Life" magazine in the 1980s of a German girl who was taken hostage by two criminals being pursued by the police... during the negotiations she was photographed with a haunting look of pure hopelessness on her face. In the end they all died because the criminals crashed the car rather than let themselves be caught. Come to think of it, that might actually be the photo itself
 
As Jesus said....we are sheep without a shepherd.

• Failure of Leadership: In the Old Testament, Israel's kings, priests, and religious authorities were called to act as shepherds. Instead of guiding and protecting the people, the religious elite of Jesus's day burdened them with legalism and neglected their spiritual care.

• Vulnerability: Like sheep wandering without a guide, the crowds were defenseless against false teachings, moral confusion, and deep life weariness.

The more things change the more they stay the same.
 
This wasn't always the case though. The people who talk about the millennium rule are closer to the truth. Things didn't start significantly deteriorating until the late 1700s. This is why many people who keep up with the millennium rule story peg America's independence day as actually independence from God and the beginning of Satan's little season. Regardless of the truth in this, it's not far off the timing of things, which is why it's believed.

We don't actually need Jesus or God as the only shepherd. Good White men can lead our own nations toward good aims if we're given power.
 
Last edited:
↑View previous replies…
"America's independence day as actually independence from God"

The only ones who believe this are the ones who are still upset that the iron rule of the aristocracy and the churches over the common people was flouted by the Founding Fathers. Yes, America is a corrupt shithole now -- that's the fate of all declining empires -- but for a couple of centuries it was one of the best places in the world in which to live, which is why tens of millions of European immigrants fled their "traditional" societies in order to settle there
 
@ChevChelios I think there's a little bit of rose covered glasses in your perception of American history. I have a book published in 1896 that goes over all the nearly exact same problems as today with the USA as a corrupt shit hole and even mentions how it's jews pulling the string over there in many facets of its society. This was published long before Hitler.

In my research, I think the USA was good from about 1776 to around the 1850s. The founding fathers may have had some good ideas but what they fought for were essentially lost when they ceased to have a part in society. The Civil War was won by the wrong side so essentially 1865 could be considered by many as the death blow to the country, while others peg it at Central Banking in 1913. For others, it was after WWI and the Great Depression then the New Deal or after WWII when the Human Rights Act and Immigration Act were implemented that finally sealed the deal. I myself actually consider 1883 when the Spoils System was abolished as the final nail in the coffin (ending the spoils system allowed Merchants to wholly capture the political class and we're facing the ramifications of that today).

Still, the point is that no, the USA didn't have a great run from 1776 to 1976. The USA has been deteriorating ever since its inception, hence the idea that it was founded at the beginning of Satan's little season.

I know some people think society has been degrading since the dawn of time but I don't agree with that take. I think degradation is actually the majority of time situation but golden ages appear every once and a while. The USA's Golden Age was from 1776 to 1865, imo (which actually aligns with the average length of time of any civilization's core peak golden age period). We've been on the decline since.

And honestly, I know some people who truly consider the constitution and founding of the USA has the beginning of the decline, which isn't so far off (that's what this book I have argues). Americans may have had their true golden age in the century leading up to 1776 and the war of independence is truly what screwed them because being a our skirts country of an empire who couldn't give a fuck about you, was quite beneficial for growth.
 
Last edited:
@CaptainTrouble

Hogwash, everyone knows the decline started when Coca-Cola changed to plastic bottles. I am old enough to remember the zenith, when every Coke bottle was still glass.

The correct answer of course, is the first 45 years of the 20th century. The world wars destroyed old Europe, and the modern banking system and introduction of the Federal Reserve laid the foundation for all the fiat inflation garbage we have now.
 
@CaptainTrouble I find it interesting how your mind understands the true BOTTOM of the rabbit hole (The Millennial Reign and Satan’s Little Season)… and yet simultaneously believe that you can evoke change (and that mark carney is a ‘good guy’)

News flash: Nothing happens without God’s will.

‘White men’ aren’t saving anybody… we’re too busy chugging beers and jerking off to unlimited free porn while simultaneously joining anti-procreation, nuclear family destroying MGTOW psyops.

Real men have been completely emaciated and castrated through feminism, the Protocals and Kalergi plan.

We are a nation under judgement. The synagogue, the muslims and the shit eaters are what we receive for abandoning the only one who ever cared enough to lay down His life for us.
 
Last edited:
@brutana_dilewski But it's not the fiat inflation that killed society. Every single White dominant country nearly immediately implemented Human Rights Acts and Immigration Acts (importing non-Whites) after the war. I have a couple books by Carroll Quigley (who Bill Clinton mentioned as his most influential professor at Georgetown University in his inauguration speech) and he discusses how Jews were the "experts" who helped write all the peace treaties White countries signed after WWII.

It's beyond obvious that they specifically created a plan to prevent White people from ever having a Nation, ever again. That's when they fully dominated us and it was done behind the scenes. Our leaders agreed to it because they fell for the idea that Hitler was bad and we can never have one again so they purposely agreed to sabotage their own nations. The jews knew what they were doing and what the long-term consequences would be though. Then all our institutions began to promote propaganda to keep White people oppressed. The holocaust was completely fabricated after the war to further humiliate White people and elevate jews in our new victim driven world.

I have an education in finance and many prestigious designations along with my intelligence. The "fiat currency is the problem" is a low-IQ trap. It really isn't. Fiat currently with a White dominant society instead of a Jewish Supremacy society that oppresses White people would be fine. Going back to the gold standard would reduce our quality of life for no gain.
 
@CaptainTrouble Then you understand that the biggest market is actually the debt market, and in its current state and trajectory it's no longer sustainable. It doesn't matter what color or ethnicity the people are, that bill will come due eventually and we won't be able to pay it...
 
@brutana_dilewski incorrect. We're in no crisis whatsoever. Check my other topic on my economic plan. I can reduce the debt down to 0 and double the economic output of our country no problem at all.

The only thing unsustainable are benefits that White people receive. Make no mistake, as things come closer to default, the money going to Whites will be reduced but no crash will ever happen. White people will just suffer more and more. There will be no big explosion where we can recover from. We either act now or die forever.
 
@Nuremburger the reason I don't believe in your line of thinking is because it's a line of thinking for losers. God's will isn't enacted through inaction of his followers. Promoting inaction because all change will be done by God and not through God's followers such that you should stop trying to accomplish anything is precisely what agents of Satan would promote because they fear the God fearing men that take action in life to vanquish evil.

You'll never convince me that sitting back and doing nothing is the correct course of action, ever.
 
@CaptainTrouble: Jewish bankers have had control of the purse strings in both the UK and Vatican City for at least the past two hundred years, the French exported "revolutionary" values all over Europe (and the world), and German romanticism produced Marxism, so I'm not sure what "traditional" country you think has been better than the US all along
 
@Nuremburger: "We are a nation under judgement. The synagogue, the muslims and the shit eaters are what we receive for abandoning the only one who ever cared enough to lay down His life for us."

If Christians are "under judgement", why are the followers of false religions the ones who are flourishing? Shouldn't they be under an even bigger judgement?

Anyway, most Christians have the kind of universalist or "anti-racist" mindset that makes them powerless to resist demographic change; in their view, it's better to have a nonwhite Christian country than a white pagan one
 
@ChevChelios Jews produced Marxism, actually. But let's not be technical...

A lot of people compare the non-land owning peasant-class only without considering the Aristocracy or land-owners when looking at historic times but this isn't necessarily a fair comparison.

In France during the mid 1600s to early 1700s, about 20% of the population were either nobles or owned land. When I was employed in Canada, I was in the top 5% of income earners. There's a fair chance if we cross-compare that I may have been a land-owner and/or even nobility. During the Spanish Empire from 1500 to the mid 1600s close to 10% of the population were nobility. There's a good chance I would have been a noble in this regime. During the German Empire from mid 700s to mid 800s, nearly 10% of the population were either nobles or land-owners. There's a good chance I would have been a land owner and/or nobility.

For myself, I likely would have been better off comparatively speaking (for the time periods within the time period) in those societies than in this one. Canada oppresses its top percentile like myself in order to elevate the bottom percentile but this was not done in these previous empires.

Today, I have a lot of technology which arguably gives me a better life in some regards but not in many others. As a noble or land-owner, I likely would have been married to a good looking woman who took care of the household while I got to partake in aristocratic duties or business management. In modern times, I struggled to even get a woman, let a alone a good looking one and I spent my time slaving away at a 9-5 job for a company that hates me. While it my appear to the outside eye that my Quality of Life is better in modernity, how I truly feel about my situation is such that I bet I would have been much happier in these older times than I am now because I would have had a relatively better life to what was known for capability of living at the time. A huge issue with modernity is knowing what could be that is denied to me so that others who hate me are elevated in society instead of me.
 
CaptainTrouble said:
Here are common techniques employed by conquerors to ensure dominance after conquering a people:


  • Elimination of the Warrior Class: In classical antiquity (such as Greek andrapodismos practiced during the Peloponnesian War), conquering forces often executed all adult men (androcide) while capturing women and children.
  • Decapitation of Leadership: Executing kings, generals, and scholars prevented remnants of the conquered society from organizing counter-rebellions.
  • Captive-Taking: Conquered women and children were integrated into the imperial economy as enslaved labor or forcibly married into the conqueror's society, altering regional demographics over generations.
  • Desecration of Sacred Sites: Destroying temples, breaking local religious idols, or transforming sacred spaces into temples of the conquerors' gods signified that the vanquished society’s deities had failed them.
  • Hostage Systems (Obsides): Empires routinely demanded the sons and daughters of local rulers as political hostages. These children were raised in the imperial capital, educated in the conquerors' language and culture, and returned home as loyal vassal rulers.
  • Divide and Rule: Elevating minority ethnic or social groups within a conquered territory created a loyal local proxy force dependent on the imperial power for its authority.
  • Imperial Resettlement: The Neo-Assyrian Empire forcibly relocated hundreds of thousands of conquered people across different corners of the empire, mixing ethnic groups to dismantle cohesive linguistic and regional identities.
  • Imposing the conqueror's legal system, tax obligations, and official language while banning indigenous laws, writing systems, or traditional assemblies eroded generational memory and forced integration into the imperial administrative network.

Now, let's analyze how these apply to modernity.


  • Warrior class eliminated in World War I and World War II
  • All monarchies removed from power after the World Wars
  • Academia completely blocking off the "right-wing" from partaking and is wholly captured by "leftism"
  • White leaders having their sons and daughters marry jews
  • Hot young White models in the public sphere are married to jews
  • Women are integrated into the workforce
  • Destruction of Old World Buildings
  • Bringing in immigrants to mate with the conquered people
  • Imposing central banking, increasing taxes to pay immigrants and non-domestic people with the tax funds and a legal system promoted by jewish lawyers/judges

It does appear to look like White people were conquered by jews after the World Wars and are now facing the consequences of such a loss.
Click to expand...
CaptainTroubleThe warrior class are like the white blood cells of your country and your people. Without them all is lost but Canadians would have you believe it's a thing of the past if it even existed at all.

Martial arts was basically an obsession of mine for 30 years. You tend to get into a certain amount of philosophy if you spend enough time doing it.

Friends and family used to think I was funny in the head and now want to talk about separation or independence and it makes me shake my head.

Supposed to have a priestly class of some kind as well.

Without warriors and holy men you will be ruled by the merchant class.
 
White people's "civilization" almost wiped out all of its warrior-class.

There's actually a gene in black people that appears to be fairly 50/50 in blacks. This gene is highly correlated to the desire to use violence to solve disputes (warrior). In White people, this gene exists but is almost non-existent. You see, in White civilization, unless you worked for the government's military, if you used violence you were hanged or imprisoned and your ability to have offspring was limited. In times of war, the government would round up any of the boys who displayed an ounce of this gene for their military and then they died in battle before they could procreate.

White people's civilization actually practiced a soft selective breeding in which the warrior gene was pretty much eradicated. Whatever was left of this gene in White people was mostly wiped out in WWI and WWII and then suppressed again in the following century. There are hardly anymore White Warriors anymore. White people have a lot of non-Warriors acting like a Warrior but a true warrior isn't some Hollywood propagandized version of a warrior in which he only uses violence as a last resort. A true warrior uses violence as his first and preferred resort.

For warriors to flourish the government cannot have a monopoly on violence.
 
Last edited:
Although we often hear that the world wars "wiped out the good genes", the odds of a British soldier surviving World War I was 90 percent and World War II, 95 percent. In addition, there was concern amongst the authorities before both wars (but especially before the First) that the average British man was too weak and undernourished to be a proper soldier
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top